Subject: Re: wpi port -- Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG chipset.
To: None <>
From: Christos Zoulas <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/06/2006 00:15:43
In article <>,
matthew green  <> wrote:
>   Another idea would be to include the ucode in base. It seems that ath
>   microcode has a similar license and we have it in base [0].
>the license seems 3-clause UCB-alike to me.  what do others think?
>i think we could just put it in base.
>   Maybe this issue should be directed to board@ or core@.
>[0]: I've been told that by including it in CVS would be considered a
>   modification. If this is true, we could make the binary file a C
>   array, include that file in the CVS tree and then build the original
>   binary file that way. IANAL. 
>how does putting it CVS modify it?  i don't buy this at all.

I don't buy this either. It looks like any other firmware from intel.