Subject: re: wpi port -- Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG chipset.
To: Rui Paulo <>
From: matthew green <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/06/2006 08:49:32
   Another idea would be to include the ucode in base. It seems that ath
   microcode has a similar license and we have it in base [0].

the license seems 3-clause UCB-alike to me.  what do others think?

i think we could just put it in base.
   Maybe this issue should be directed to board@ or core@.


[0]: I've been told that by including it in CVS would be considered a
   modification. If this is true, we could make the binary file a C
   array, include that file in the CVS tree and then build the original
   binary file that way. IANAL. 
how does putting it CVS modify it?  i don't buy this at all.