Subject: re: wpi port -- Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG chipset.
To: Rui Paulo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: matthew green <email@example.com>
Date: 06/06/2006 08:49:32
Another idea would be to include the ucode in base. It seems that ath
microcode has a similar license and we have it in base .
the license seems 3-clause UCB-alike to me. what do others think?
i think we could just put it in base.
Maybe this issue should be directed to board@ or core@.
: I've been told that by including it in CVS would be considered a
modification. If this is true, we could make the binary file a C
array, include that file in the CVS tree and then build the original
binary file that way. IANAL.
how does putting it CVS modify it? i don't buy this at all.