Subject: Re: structural bus_space_handles
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 06/05/2006 03:24:48
In article <4483934C.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Garrett D'Amore <email@example.com> wrote:
>Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <44830CB6.firstname.lastname@example.org>,
>> Garrett D'Amore <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> SPARC64 uses a struct instead of an address or pointer for a
>>> bus_space_handle_t. This creates an ugly situation in some code (ath in
>>> particular), forcing us to have #ifdef __sparc64__ in this code to
>>> handle this case. (The Atheros HAL layer wants a single pointer for a
>>> It would be cleaner to have a macro in bus.h, ala
>>> __BUS_SPACE_HANDLE_IS_STRUCT, so that I could test for that flag instead
>>> of having a test for a specific port. What do folks think?
>> Maybe a bus_space_get_handle() macro?
>The problem is that I need to store these things in a void *. Because
>that's all the binary HAL gives me.
void *bus_space_externalize(bus_space_tag_t *)
bus_space_tag_t *bus_space_internalize(void *)