Subject: Re: Bluetooth
To: Iain Hibbert <>
From: Matthias Drochner <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/27/2006 15:56:26 said:
> netbt.32.tar.gz

I haven't got hardware to test, and I only had a very brief
look at the code, mostly to see whether you deal better with
the autoconf stuff than the USB code. (And indeed you do.)
Just some more stylistic comments.
-For simple cases of submatch functions we have a
 "config_stdsubmatch" now. (That's actually my major grief
 with the USB code - it overloads the "uhub" interface with
 completely different stuff.)
-Can you explain why the "bthub" pseudo-device is necessary?
-Use of "sdp" is namespace pollution IMHO, that word is
 massively overloaded.

best regards