Subject: Re: Bluetooth
To: Iain Hibbert <email@example.com>
From: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>
Date: 05/27/2006 15:56:26
I haven't got hardware to test, and I only had a very brief
look at the code, mostly to see whether you deal better with
the autoconf stuff than the USB code. (And indeed you do.)
Just some more stylistic comments.
-For simple cases of submatch functions we have a
"config_stdsubmatch" now. (That's actually my major grief
with the USB code - it overloads the "uhub" interface with
completely different stuff.)
-Can you explain why the "bthub" pseudo-device is necessary?
-Use of "sdp" is namespace pollution IMHO, that word is