Subject: Re: uvisor driver support for Palm z22
To: None <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/03/2006 13:22:00
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:48:13AM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to increase the timeout time?
> Either there is a longer, more-correct timeout that will work, or we're
> doing something wrong in the probe which results in the z22 not
Thanks for the reply, and sorry it took a while for this response, as I have
had trouble downloading my mail the past few days.
I will look for a more effective solution following your suggestion.
My patch works, but it is obviously a hack, in that it does not directly
address the cause of the problem, but rather prevents the timeout error
from being issued.
Where is the timeout period set?