This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigB4DD522320D99E7F4C95AA9B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Michal Stepien wrote:
> I would like to ask why developers of netbsd fight
> with both firewalls (ipf and pf) 

Because some people prefer ipf over pf.

> if pf could
> be very nice integrated with altq?

What kind of argument is that? Of course pf can be integrated into altq 
if you drop ipf, but why is that a reason to drop ipf without further 
discussion?

Besides this, there already is work going on on improving our ALTQ stuff 
so both ipf and pf can work with it.

Cheers,
-- 
         Thomas E. Spanjaard
         tgen@netphreax.net

--------------enigB4DD522320D99E7F4C95AA9B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEM9zu6xCMwBJ+1+sRA0I9AKCJIPyZ0YgJdyJOFtzilyZYCOrRTgCghHGZ
nAbjDbL2TS5r9aLt6+OaBiQ=
=Vsh9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigB4DD522320D99E7F4C95AA9B--