tech-kern: Re: scheduler assertions

Subject: Re: scheduler assertions
To: None <erh@nimenees.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/21/2006 18:44:18

> 	Currently SCHED_ASSERT_{,UN}LOCKED actually do something when either
> LOCKDEBUG or MULTIPROCESSOR are defined.  Does anyone mind if I change
> that to be a noop when !LOCKDEBUG?
> 
> eric

isn't it already a noop?

YAMAMOTO Takashi