Subject: Re: mcclock_isa.c unification
To: Izumi Tsutsui <email@example.com>
From: Garrett D'Amore <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/13/2006 08:49:41
Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> In article <44159C68.email@example.com>
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> I like the idea at least of having mcclock_common in dev/ic, and having
>> bus- or machine-specific attachment code.
> We already have dev/ic/mc146818.c, but it has a problem.
> The mcclock also has an interval timer and some port (pmax)
> uses it for timer (tick) interrupts but mc146818.c doesn't
> take care of it. I have no idea how it should be handled in MI
> code yet.
Hmm... maybe this warrants adding some code the MI routine. I've not
looked at the driver myself yet, but just adding some functions which MD
code could call seems like a step in the right direction.
> We also have to consider how mips/mips_mcclock.c and releated
> files should be rewriten. (should they be moved into arch/pmax?)
Don't know the answer to this. :-)
> Izumi Tsutsui
Garrett D'Amore, Principal Software Engineer
Tadpole Computer / Computing Technologies Division,
General Dynamics C4 Systems
Phone: 951 325-2134 Fax: 951 325-2191