YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> i don't think the meaning of groups should be changed on the branch.
> ie. it should be discussed separately from kauth framework itself.

Yeah... hence the "assuming we..." ;)

kauth(9) sorts its list of groups so memcmp() would even be safe here.
It's important to remember, though, that this routine is called only
from one place in the NFS code, in a place -- and please correct me
if I'm wrong, as I'm not that familiar with NFS -- that isn't entered
too much, so there's not really a question of performance here.

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat