Subject: Re: Documenting filesystem kernel options outside of options(4)
To: Magnus Eriksson <email@example.com>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/11/2006 16:49:47
On Friday 10 March 2006 11:37, Magnus Eriksson wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Michael-John Turner wrote:
> > Two options:
> > 1 - Include the required/optional kernel options (and only the kernel
> > options) in the respective mount*.8 manual pages.
> > 2 - Create a section 4 manual page for each filesystem type (ffs.4,
> > cd9660.4, smbfs.4, etc), explaining in more detail what its for,
> > certain key data structures, required and optional kernel options,
> > etc (much like raid.4). The various mount*.8 could then refer to
> > the *.4 for the particular filesystem.
> > Any thoughts on this? Is it worthwhile creating such filesystem manual
> > pages or documenting the kernel options in each mount* manpage (or both)?
> > Should I rather spend my time on something more useful? :)
> This user thinks that having real live manpages for the file systems would
> be Really Nice. Looking in mount_<foo> seems counterintuitive, and the
> file systems themselves aren't really described in depth at all now (are
I also think that these pages should exist and that they could be very
But they should only detail the "public" interface of the file system;
i.e., kernel options, the mount arguments structure, in which scenarios it
is useful, etc.
Julio M. Merino Vidal <email@example.com>
The Julipedia - http://julipedia.blogspot.com/