On Mar 8, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Elad Efrat wrote:

> That is something I didn't want to get into, but would be easy enough
> to change -- once we have figured what to do with the accounting bit.

Yah... anyone have any suggestions? :-)

>
>> Yes, I think we should keep as close to Darwin's KPI as possible, in
>> this regard.
>
> That would require a big sweep that I don't mind doing but would  
> rather
> postpone until more critical issues are solved, if no one minds. I
> *will* change it.

Cool, thanks!

-- thorpej