Subject: Re: CVS commit: [elad-kernelauth] src/sys
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
Date: 03/08/2006 18:55:53
Jason Thorpe wrote:
> I definitely agree with Yamamoto-san here... we should use the "reverse
> DNS name" convention as well (I would like more of our subsystems that
> name things to use this convention, including representing dependencies
> within things like config(8)).
Yeah, there was no good reason to do it the way I originally did so I
changed that earlier today.
> Also, please cite the TN in <sys/kauth.h>,
> and we should also describe
> which routines are NetBSD extensions (either permanent new parts of the
> KPI that we have created, or transitional things that will eventually
> go away...)
Documentation is one thing I haven't touched at all... I would still
like to at least fix the major bug present (wrt/set-id binaries, I
suspect? maybe that's a hint? ;) but I'll definitely get to writing some
>> - how about providing suser() as a wrapper of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER?
>> (for now?)
> I think providing an suser() wrapper would be a fine idea.
I have no problem making suser() work with the kernel authorization KPI
but, like I said in my other mail, I would like to not do that for now.
I'm not sure what concern this is (since I sync the code..) and it is my
hope to bury the concept of "root" at least in the kernel
> I would like to thank Elad for picking up this ball and rolling with
> it, after I nudged him in this direction.
No problem, thanks to you too. :)