On Feb 22, 2006, at 8:20 PM, Jonathan Stone wrote:

> While I wholeheartedly applaud you giving Sam credit by coining
> "Leffler IPsec' ----- unless Sam objects, and based on his slides from
> BSDcon in San Mateo, I almost wish you'd call it Leffler/Stone IPsec.
> I've said elsewhere (I hope in NetBSD CVS commit messages?!)  that Sam
> deserves all the credit, and I deserve any blame for NetBSD-specific
> lossage; but I think it' also a fair cop to claim that FAST_IPSEC
> wouldn't be what it is, without my small contribution.

Fair enough -- it's just convenient to refer to it that way, that's all.

> Errrr...Jason, I now realize I'm writing this on the asumption that
> you *have* seen Sam's quote of my comments on his original FAST_IPSEC
> plans, particlularly a compare-and-contrast of slide #2 and #3 of his
> BSDcon presentation. Have you?

Of course.

-- thorpej