Jonathan Stone <jonathan@Pescadero.dsg.stanford.edu> writes:

> Yes, but from that, I conclude those machines don't use or require
> IPv6 with IPsec?  I seem to recall rumoure problems with FAST_IPSEC
> and strict-alignment machines.

PR 30057
http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=30057

> Aside from NAT_T (mentioned above) and the well-known lack of IPv6 IPsec
> support (due to absense of IPv6-fans willing to acutally do the work),
> what's FAST_IPSEC missing?

Well, another bug I know about is PR 30124, which is a more generic
problem I experienced with FAST_IPSEC. I can't say I know of other
feature-level items missing, though.

http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=30124

        - Nathan