Jonathan Stone <jonathan@Pescadero.dsg.stanford.edu> writes:

> 2. Core has therefore considerably softened the earlier stance,
>    which was along the lines of "IPv4 mapped IPv6 addresses
>    considered harmfull."  [NB, that's the acutal title
>    of a repeatedly-issued internet draft written by a former Core
> member]

This is a different issue. We need to proper support IPv4 mapped IPv6
addresses. The discussion on whether net.inet6.ip6.v6only is left to
'1' or '0' is another topic. ;-)

-- 
  Rui Paulo			<rpaulo@{NetBSD{,-PT}.org,fnop.net}>