|     > Yes, that would be a perfectly fine solution if fsck would actually
|     > honour pass numbers != 1 to order them. Sadly enough, it doesn't happen.
| 
|  if by "bug" you mean "works exactly as documented", then, yes.
|  (ie, it's a mis-feature.)

  Is there any reason not to un-mis-feature it? I guess it's not as
if anyone would depend on that behaviour or anything would break if
pass numbers would do what one naively expects?

	mjl