YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>>> - Add two new functions, wsevent_free and wsevent_inject.  The former
>>>>   returns the amount of free space in the queue and the latter adds a
>>>>   new event to it.  The latter assumes that the queue has at least  
>>>> one
>>>>   free slot.
>>>>         
>>> I think wseevent_free is a poor name (sonds like the free you do  
>>> after malloc).
>>> Maybe wsevent_available()?
>>>       
>> Excellent.  I also thought that free was inappropriate but couldn't
>> think of a better name :-)
>>     
>
> to me, "inject" also sounds weird, given that what it does is
> the opposite of read.  i'd suggest enqueue or write.
>   
IMO enqueue is better.  write has a specific connotation with respect to
user vs. devices.  (User programs write from application to device.  If
I understand, this is the reverse, where the device is sending events to
be picked up by the framework.)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding though.

    -- Garrett
> there is very old patch which does something similar.
> http://www.NetBSD.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=12132
>
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
>   


-- 
Garrett D'Amore, Principal Software Engineer
Tadpole Computer / Computing Technologies Division,
General Dynamics C4 Systems
http://www.tadpolecomputer.com/
Phone: 951 325-2134  Fax: 951 325-2191