Subject: Could this be a bug?
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Chapman Flack <nblists@anastigmatix.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/12/2006 21:45:29
spotted in passing in kern_kcont.c:

371:        SIMPLEQ_INIT(&kcq_softclock);
372:        kc_si_softclock = softintr_establish(IPL_SOFTCLOCK,
373:            kcont_run_softclock, &kcq_softnet);
374:
375:        SIMPLEQ_INIT(&kcq_softnet);
376:        kc_si_softnet = softintr_establish(IPL_SOFTNET,
377:            kcont_run_softnet, &kcq_softnet);
378:
379:        SIMPLEQ_INIT(&kcq_softserial);
380:        kc_si_softserial = softintr_establish(IPL_SOFTSERIAL,
381:            kcont_run_softserial, &kcq_softserial);

Should the last argument in line 373 be &kcq_softclock?  Looks
almost like a copy and paste artifact. Apparently doesn't break
much of anything, as it's been that way since 1.1 - but it makes
me wonder.

-Chap