Subject: Re: c99 in KNF?
To: Matthew Mondor <mm_lists@pulsar-zone.net>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/12/2006 08:43:31
On Jan 11, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Matthew Mondor wrote:
> Are C99 types already favored over u_int32_t etc now in the NetBSD
> tree?
Yes. And they are perfectly safe in C89 code, since the typedefs are
provided by our own header files. The only one that should not be
used at the moment is <stdbool.h>, since our C89 compiler doesn't
provide the appropriate type primitive.
-- thorpej