Subject: Re: brconfig and "ipf" to use "pfil" also
To: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
From: Thomas E. Spanjaard <tgen@netphreax.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/11/2006 23:37:11
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig8300397EDF2CF58AFB187156
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>>We should also rename the option "BRIDGE_IPF" to "BRIDGE_PFIL" or
>>"PFIL_BRIDGE". Or we might even get rid of this option completely (default
>>is disabled).

Pro, but keep it, like GATEWAY.

> And now I see GENERIC kernel configuration comment could be improved and 
> brconfig has at least two possible outputs showing "ipfilter" (for status 
> or -a output). Maybe these could be more generic (not ipfilter specific).

If the changes go in, ofcourse they'd need to be changed.

> Would adding "pfil" as a command option for brconfig be okay?

Yup, I'm in favour.

Cheers,
-- 
         Thomas E. Spanjaard
         tgen@netphreax.net

--------------enig8300397EDF2CF58AFB187156
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDxZat6xCMwBJ+1+sRA1r6AJ9inAsAl6q4r4pEDQ8pZw7BiH7KCwCgoDOv
++7fMQ3oq0hbqYCl69z6Y3s=
=WvO8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig8300397EDF2CF58AFB187156--