Subject: Re: pointer atomicity
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Chapman Flack <nblists@anastigmatix.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/11/2006 17:16:41
Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> m68k, too, afaik.
I suppose just about anything that supports paging and unaligned
access, a combination that had slipped my mind for a moment.
Thanks for reminding me - looks like the assumption of atomicity
is a good one to avoid unless the alignment situation is very
clearly pinned down, and not worth the trouble for my purposes.
-Chap