Subject: Re: Device minor numbers conversion in COMPAT_NETBSD32
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/03/2006 16:12:05
>> - keep new dev numbers strictly in sync (like sparc and sparc64 do)
> i think this is the crux of the problem; for a purely cosmetic reason
> a different device format was chosen.

Purely cosmetic?  I thought it was done to avoid a flag day in /dev
when switching from an 8-partition kernel to a 16-partition kernel.

Of course, you may consider that "purely cosmetic".  Personally, I'm
inclined to agree, but I suspect a lot of relatively Unix-naïve users
would disagree.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B