Subject: Re: Device minor numbers conversion in COMPAT_NETBSD32
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/03/2006 11:45:31
--aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:34:44AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 09:23:18AM +0000, David Brownlee wrote:
> > We could allocate new matching device numbers for disks on both
> > ports, and leave the old numbers as compat glue for each port,
> > so old machines can continue to work but the results of a new
> > MAKEDEV can be shared between ports...
>=20
> We could simply do
>=20
> - enable magic symlinks in fstab and kernels on i386 and amd64
> - have i386 standard install create /dev.i386 and /dev.amd63, each
> popluated with proper content
> - ln -s /dev.${MACHINE_ARCH} /dev
Actually, I like this idea as something that sysinst can OPTIONALLY do.=20
That way if you need the ability, you get it. Otherwise, /dev is what it=20
is as it has always been.
Running an amd64 kernel on an i386 /dev is an uncommon occurence at best.=
=20
I think it's great for us to have a recomended way of handling it, but I=20
don't think we need emulation-based tricks nor do we need to explicitly=20
support it in the common case.
Take care,
Bill
--aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFDutRbWz+3JHUci9cRAqb1AJ42Vqv0x4e88EBn3i93kdBv3V903QCeIBqN
RtQ8FlrY+ihMuVkMIVAMiX8=
=kF91
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--aT9PWwzfKXlsBJM1--