Subject: Re: Adding Multiboot support (or not)
To: Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84@gmail.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/29/2005 10:04:39
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 05:25:34PM +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
[snip]
> Note that this does not change the traditional boot process at all and
Ok, you've gotten positive feedback. I'll chime in. I like the change, and=
=20
the sentence above is the clincher for me. :-)
The only complexity we would be adding is that we now have to validate two=
=20
entry points (and whatever code differs until the boot paths merge). While=
=20
technically a concern, I don't think it'll be a big deal.
Take care,
Bill
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFDtCU3Wz+3JHUci9cRAq2UAJ9cASzPfuYD/rLx5p9X6DvBYtUCAwCgh+M1
dEA5C+IfFj5CitS/YLrGLpk=
=MRNh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9--