Subject: Re: 3.0 pcmcia regressions?
To: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: John Nemeth <email@example.com>
Date: 12/28/2005 00:30:11
On Apr 14, 6:26pm, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} In article <200512280242.jBS2geUq020037@vtn1.victoria.tc.ca>,
} John Nemeth <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
} > Are there known cardbus/pcmcia regressions in 3.0? I recently
} >upgraded my laptop and I just went through and tested all my cards. The
} >Cisco Aironet 350, 3Com 3C589D, and IBM Token Ring (which is documented
} >in GENERIC as not working with cardbus bridges) adapters all worked.
} >However, the US Robotics XJ/CC1336 modem and Adaptec 1460D SCSI
} >adapter don't. In the case of the modem, when I cu to it, I don't
} >get any response to commands. In the case of the SCSI adapter, it prints
} >"aic0: unable to detect chip!"
} Yes, there is a problem and there is a patch to fix it. The patch works
} around the problem, but it is not entirely correct. Setting cfe->iomask = 0;
} does the trick, but the problem is really in the way we allocate regions.
And, where does this setting go?
}-- End of excerpt from Christos Zoulas