Subject: Re: My changes to subr_disc_mbr (Was Re: default generated disklabels
To: Reinoud Zandijk <email@example.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/15/2005 02:59:56
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
>> That is INCORRECT. Why should a disk device driver CARE if there is
>> a label on the disk or not? It only cares if there was an error
>> trying to probe for one.
> providing a default label with commonly used filingsystems on it?
Why would a disk device driver (which should only care for blocks, as far
as I understand) be interested in a filesystem structure?