Subject: Re: Getting rid of /dev/veriexec
To: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: Quentin Garnier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/02/2005 17:04:00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 05:51:09PM +0200, Elad Efrat wrote:
> Jason Thorpe wrote:
> > As you said before, there is really no change to veriexec here except=
> > for "sysctl entry point vs device entry point". Since both choices are
> > basically non-optimal, I don't see any real benefit to changing=20
> > veriexec at this time, since you're just trading one ugly solution for
> > another.
> While there is no change to the end-user here, I *still* think that
> sysctl is a more logical place to have these hooks in.
And I *still* don't see any answer to my post in this thread (and my
comments elsewhere...) about compatibility with previous releases.
What I see here is that you're proposing a cosmetic change at the cost
of breaking compatibility. I see _very little_ gain in that.
Quentin Garnier - email@example.com - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----