Subject: Re: proposal for Linux exit_group emulation
To: Emmanuel Dreyfus <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/02/2005 10:26:14
On Dec 2, 3:03pm, email@example.com (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: proposal for Linux exit_group emulation
| > This looks ugly to me. Why trap both the syscall and tne userret?
| In userret to catch processes sleeping in the kernel
| In syscall to catch processes running in userland. I realize this is
| poor since the process could spend quite some time before going in
| the kernel. Sending it a signal is not possible because it will be
| reported to wait4(). What else can be done?
You have control over who gets notified in the wait call. I.e. you can
check a flag in the wait call and not notify the parent, right?
| > Have you tested the above with openoffice or java?
| It works fine with java. I don't have the OpenOffice monster at hand.
You should install the monster, because this is the application that