Subject: Re: free space (was /dev) on tmpfs problem
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/28/2005 06:50:39
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 02:05:33AM -0600, David Young wrote:
> > > 1 Set no size: the tmpfs will grow without bound, reclaiming
> > > memory from file cache to fulfill tmpfs demand.
> > > 2 Set a size with -s in terms of a percentage of RAM.
> > > 3 Set a size with -s in terms of blocks, megabytes, ....
> > >=20
> > > I prefer #1. Dan Carosone sent me a patch for #1 that beautifully so=
> > > the problem that began this discussion. I would like to see it commi=
So would I, but there were objections from several folks with valued
opinions. Are those objections still held?
I would at the least like to commit the part that reproduces the
existing calculation more efficiently.
> > Would it still be possible to use -s after you commited the patch?
Yes, my change doesn't affect the -s limit at all, just the free space
reporting (whether capped at such a limit or not).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----