Subject: re: free space (was /dev) on tmpfs problem
To: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/15/2005 10:23:18 
   
   On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 02:25:19PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
   > I totally support yamt's patch ... mandating -s is a reasonable  
   > solution.
   
   If we go this way, I think it should at least be resizable somehow.
   If I add extra swap I want tmpfs to have more free space, even if
   there's a manual step involved.  Likewise in the other direction.

sysctl vm.tmpfs0.size

or something else dynamically created at tmpfs mount time?