Subject: Re: free space (was /dev) on tmpfs problem
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/15/2005 09:50:44
--OWkk16wqu45RnV2G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 02:25:19PM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> I totally support yamt's patch ... mandating -s is a reasonable =20
> solution.

If we go this way, I think it should at least be resizable somehow.
If I add extra swap I want tmpfs to have more free space, even if
there's a manual step involved.  Likewise in the other direction.

--
Dan.

--OWkk16wqu45RnV2G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDeRTEEAVxvV4N66cRAraaAKDWPEa92J3P8969ZSimS55ERdobvwCg3FX9
BkLEKm2w9ZUlkQL0C4GqIXo=
=MCoX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OWkk16wqu45RnV2G--