Subject: Re: tape drive instrumentation round 2
To: Brett Lymn <email@example.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/14/2005 10:01:09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:19:09PM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:19:28AM +1100, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> > IMHO, "disk" and "drive" are often interchangeable terms.
> OK, I have heard of a disk drive but never a tape disk :) which is why
> a chose drive.
> > Isn't your rework really a more generic "block IO stats" framework ?
> > If so, how about a name that more reflects the latter?
> Sure, does blkio sound any better? I am not really fussed as long as
> we get away from it sounding disk specific because I believe that to
> be misleading.
Uh oh. We're putting more messages into the name than the code. Either=20
it's fine or we aren't looking close enough at it. ;-)
I'm going to vote for "drive". We also include NFS info, which really=20
isn't "block" based. :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----