Martin Husemann wrote:

>On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:52:17PM -0800, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>  
>
>>My proposal, therefore, is to add a field, like this:
>>
>>   snprintf(vci, sizeof(vci), "%s:%s:%s:kernel:%s", ostype, machine,
>>       machine_arch, osrelease);
>>    
>>
>
>How about leaving out machine_arch if it is equal to machine here?
>This would keep archs where the current state already works compatible.
>  
>
That seems like a reasonable idea to me.   (Actually, I was already 
thinking that, and forgot to mention it in my proposal.)


-- 
Garrett D'Amore                          http://www.tadpolecomputer.com/
Sr. Staff Engineer          Extending the Power of 64-bit UNIX Computing
Tadpole Computer, Inc.                             Phone: (951) 325-2134