Subject: re: use .d for kernel
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/08/2005 20:36:04
> Can you please explain how this is different from how it's done today, and
> what the benefits of the new or drawbacks of the old version are?
- better concurrency. (ie. make -j)
- consistency with the rest of tree.
it also makes UPDATE builds faster i believe, since it only has to
rebuild the .d files for the changed files, not everything (except
the libs -- libkern & libcompat already use separate .d files.)
this would be great.