Subject: Re: scheduler_wait_hook
To: None <email@example.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/06/2005 19:01:28
> >> That specifically was the intent of the change. Please discuss with
> >> Ross Harvey.
> > is he reading this list?
> > i think that the change is broken and should be backed out at least.
> I brought the message to his attention.
how long should i wait?
there are several choices.
0. keep it as-is. (IMO broken)
1. remove the feedback completely.
2. do the feedback strictly.
(keep how much p_estcpu is inherited from the parent.
and decay it appropriately)
3. do the feedback in a compromised way.
(eg. my proposed patch)
4. any other good idea?