Subject: Re: gcc4.0
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Matthew Mondor <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/03/2005 10:46:38
Speaking about gcc bugs, could anyone confirm if toolchain/26456
is relevant (sure seems like a bug), and if this was fixed in
3.4/4.x? Perhaps that a few followups to the PR about this would
add evidence that a gcc upgrade is in order...
Note: Please only reply on the list, other mail is blocked by default.
Private messages from your address can be allowed by first asking.