Subject: Re: SMBus implementation
To: Allen Briggs <briggs@netbsd.org>
From: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/29/2005 00:30:01
--Signature_Sat__29_Oct_2005_00_30_01_-0400_RcF5Q93r3GtPeYaR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
> > Hmm, the datasheets for both AD chips mention vendor, device ID and
> > revision number in registers 0x3d-0x3f, no idea if that's compliant
> > to anything.
>=20
> Oh, hmmm. Maybe the mfgid and devid are standardized -- I haven't=20
> tried to find the smbus specification. If that's not standard,
> then I wonder how the enumeration works. I'll try to locate the
> standard before I comment further...
I guess I'll do the same. So far I've been handling the AD chips like
simple iic devices and didn't pay any attention to SMBus stuff.
have fun
Michael
--Signature_Sat__29_Oct_2005_00_30_01_-0400_RcF5Q93r3GtPeYaR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)
iQEVAwUBQ2L6ycpnzkX8Yg2nAQJePggAooObqPTh+fFe5XAkr2ppOMdeo8vDwE9x
nMwZ+5kasu19LtitpSvRzCQ6g5nxmhTMK2xXyXgcFjB7lB2kRdxEyv2XpoBl1lSN
vW7Jy4y1IkIaGKZDeJyxs9iiTg5Bf70Xyn7bHzsiXn3uEnFfb7cFg2X1Y+65ASif
xXElngH44kPNA/qsGbGBMyAoafTJoUhAaeDgHCHzbZQb4zNQfIeAO/IzHY/Rf7Rl
p1Urs4G5uJKLsqqU1GPslBlybGWoE+nro5tkskxHoi1DbTa1LCF4XDzDWCLnI2t7
OcgLclj3ilWSiZF//pBX6NZ2Zh6fph69q5fU47uCX1fJVOK0ZSQT8g==
=umSg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature_Sat__29_Oct_2005_00_30_01_-0400_RcF5Q93r3GtPeYaR--