Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5/6/7 kernel emulator for NetBSD 2.x
To: Steven M. Bellovin <email@example.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/28/2005 16:41:36
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 04:01:56PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> In message <D8F0C8E3-2698-4AF9-9DEF-85B68C6C54C5@shagadelic.org>, Jason T=
> >And you will still be able to do that. Who says the devfs can't be =20
> >mounted read-only? Who says "nodev" won't continue to work on =20
> >regular file systems? No one has made any such claim.
> Will it still be possible to create devices inodes by major/minor=20
Well, we don't have an implementation, but my thought is "no." This may=20
not work out, though...
> I was wondering about a chrooted application -- it needs some devices
> (/dev/null is the obvious example), but I would not want it to have all=
> of devfs. (I also want to ensure that it can't mount it....)
My thought about that was to permit a second (or more) devfs mount, and=20
use them for chroot environments. And they would only get a subset of=20
devices. And even if the main devfs could gain nodes after boot, they=20
could well not (and probably shouldn't).
But we don't yet have an implementation and we don't have experience with=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----