On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:28:10AM +0200, Vincent wrote:
> On the other hand, though I've not carried out a deep analysis, I wonder 
> how a program that is known to work on Linux "as is" can generate this 
> kind of error on NetBSD.

"Known to work" is a vague term here - they don't even know what things
it does wrong and what consequences it has. "Seems to work" is a more 
apropriate term here ;-)

Martin