Subject: Re: bufq: readprio vs priocscan dbench results
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Juan RP <email@example.com>
Date: 10/11/2005 22:41:13
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:29:27 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> These are very interesting. But I am curious -- it doesn't seem like
> you retested with the 6-queue priocscan configuration that gave the
> best performance without softdep in your earlier test?
I'll try this soon (I don't have the same machine right now), otherwise
I'd have to run same tests on this box with a SATA drive.
> Also, some numbers for average request latency might be very
> revealing. I think you could get these with postmark (the NetApp
> benchmark) though you may need to tweak its tunables some.
Sure, next time I'll use postmark (and iozone maybe?).