Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/etc/etc.macppc
To: Pavel Cahyna <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
Date: 10/10/2005 07:46:07
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:56:18AM +0200, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:50:14PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > On Oct 7, 11:20pm, firstname.lastname@example.org (Pavel Cahyna) wro=
> > | On platforms which have multiple drivers for serial ports, what would=
> > | the major number of /dev/tty0?
> > it would be different depending on the '?'. I am not sure I like this m=
> Wouldn't this put a hard limit on the number of ports of one type that one
> can have?
> > but the alternative is to go to /dev/ttyXXX like other drivers do, or u=
> > tty1? tty2? etc.
> That one too?
Yes & no.
It would put a limit on the number of ports of a type you could have
without having a discontinuity in the numbering when you use the default
macppc used to have tty00 and tty01 be the zstty serial ports, and tty10
was a com serial port. That leaves room for 8 zstty serial ports w/o
having to skip around. If you do skip 10 throuh 19, you then have the
whole field open.
It's not been my experience that folks add a lot of zstty or com serial=20
ports. Thus I don't think tty00/01/10 naming is an issue. If you are=20
adding more than ten of either, you have to roll your own MAKEDEV, so the=
numbering isn't that big a deal.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----