Subject: wedges and DEV_BSIZE (Was Re: removing VOPs)
To: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Reinoud Zandijk <email@example.com>
Date: 10/08/2005 14:37:21
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hiya Jason, hiya Folks
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:42:15AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> No objections here -- I'm all for simplifying the VFS layer.
That brings me to the following question regarding DEV_BSIZE (see
discusstion earlier on tech-kern):
Is the wedge system to provide a new interface for filingsystems to disc
devices or wouldn't that be preferable?
Wouldn't it then be the time to also scrap the fixed DEV_BSIZE blocksize
interface to discs to replace it with a *sector-size* oriented interface so
various filingsystems like msdosfs and udf eventually can support non 512
There has been several patches around for yonks that fixes these issues but
they were never integrated. Our msdosfs f.e. doesn't support non 512
bytes/sector devices. Filingsystems DO change on sectorsize and devices
like DVD/CD+-(M)R(W) can't just do read-modify-write cycle to cope with
blocksizes smaller than the sector size.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----