Subject: Re: scheduler_wait_hook
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/07/2005 11:24:02
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:52:29AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > That specifically was the intent of the change. Please discuss with =
> > Ross Harvey.
> is he reading this list?
> i think that the change is broken and should be backed out at least.
The change is what made a machine doing big builds in the background
still useful for long-running interactive processes with marginal cpu
usage. Leave it in.
(Without the change, a process could intentionally fork thousands of=20
workers to consume half a timeslice each, and none of them would ever
be penalized for it).
Read the mailing list archive from "back then" for the discussion.
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----