Subject: Re: removing VOPs
To: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/28/2005 11:29:26
--b/6gol1SqNxk8K3i
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:02:44PM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> I have looked a little at FiST, but not far enough. However I doubt that=
=20
> these operations that Yamamoto-san is thinking about are anything that=20
> FiST needs to deal with. Part of his whole point is that nothing outside=
=20
> of the file systems themselves will make these calls, thus FiST will neve=
r=20
> need to intercept them.
Whichever class each operation ends up in, stacking and shimming is a
great test of the interface specification. If it meets this case, and
doesn't exceed it, that's about the best metric of goodness we're
likely to get in practice.
--
Dan.
--b/6gol1SqNxk8K3i
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFDOfH2EAVxvV4N66cRAgQ4AKDepR+gE9fhny0cbvHwIFQZ8/wRngCfYW3P
T71ksV+QQbBd40YTIzOZW18=
=/gYO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--b/6gol1SqNxk8K3i--