> However, it's the necessary thing within the present
> interface, and helps teach jrp about that interface and its
> deficiencies for this goal :)

not strictly necessary.  you can move requests from the temporary bufq
to new bufq again.  (i'm not saying that it's a good idea. :-)

> We already have some bufq types that contain
> other bufq's, like the multi-level READPRIO.

what's "multi-level READPRIO" ?

YAMAMOTO Takashi