In message <20050831231543.GU6862@bcd.geek.com.au>, Daniel Carosone writes:
>
>--8r7XanZh5e+04UYw
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:15:09AM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>> >See http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2005/05/06/0008.html
>>=20
>> OK.  But why don't I have to do that on my other machines?
>
>Any differences in directory structure under /emul/linux between the
>machines?  Perhaps the chdir is winding up under /emul in one case,
>and not in another where the /emul instance of the directory doesn't
>exist?
>

I doubt it, though I can check -- all of the machines in question have 
suse91 installed, and I haven't touched anything there.  But I'll look; 
thanks for the suggestion.

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb