--GpGaEY17fSl8rd50
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:54:29PM +0300, Elad Efrat wrote:
> Simon Burge wrote:
>=20
> > The current behaviour is to return EPERM.  It sounds like from the rest
> > of your message you meant that instead of ESRCH, or did I misunderstand
> > you?
>=20
> While this is true, I just noted that you can find out if a PID is
> running or not in other ways than sending it signals; so it doesn't
> matter what you return.... however, I think we should be returning ESRCH
> to be consistent with the rest of the output.

Well, I think the eventual hope is we will find those holes and close=20
them. :-)

Take care,

Bill

--GpGaEY17fSl8rd50
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDFhJkWz+3JHUci9cRAoG+AJ4tpa/1djqPBnbDXo0cPuU4kkbnuwCdE/wJ
ZMzSMJDNdMkzNLDsnbth75s=
=j6dQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GpGaEY17fSl8rd50--