--17/8oYur5Y32USnW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:36:36PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> >And if we went with the Solaris model, I think it should have its own
> >security.something namespace. :-)
>=20
> Just to clarify, I meant a seperate namespace _outside_ sysctl (if that=
=20
> makes sense, dunno).

Sorry, I didn't pick up on that, and it's a bit beyond what I was hoping=20
to discuss.

But you are right. I'm sure we can easily get to the point where sysctl=20
isn't the right tool to express policies.

Take care,

Bill

--17/8oYur5Y32USnW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDFQs7Wz+3JHUci9cRAn2LAKCPUhBsS03pXBvLuTfoe2CdVxumkACfSNgF
6zaM00bbvn9AeKzuqb5d4Do=
=v22r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--17/8oYur5Y32USnW--