Subject: Re: Playing with dkwedge
To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@NetBSD.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-kern
Date: 08/22/2005 09:39:53
--ylUvUtShPtQAJVVd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 06:09:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> I'm now running a system with wedges support enabled and it seems to work
>=20
> proton> dmesg | egrep "(^dk|^wd0)"                                       =
   [~]
> wd0 at atabus0 drive 0: <ST3120022A>
> wd0: drive supports 16-sector PIO transfers, LBA48 addressing
> wd0: 111 GB, 232581 cyl, 16 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 234441648 sect=
ors
> dk0 at wd0: wd0a
> dk0: 263088 blocks at 63, type: ffs
> dk1 at wd0: wd0b
> dk1: 1049328 blocks at 263151, type: swap
> dk2 at wd0: wd0e
> dk2: 40960080 blocks at 1312479, type: ffs
> [..]

Just a TODO note for later; I can't recall if this came up already..

Looking at this made me realise one 'problem' to be avoided in future
work on wedges if they're named like this: presented with an fstab
listing filesystems on /dev/dk* like this, fsck will try to check
multiple partitions of the same physical volume in parallel
competition with eachother.

--
Dan.


--ylUvUtShPtQAJVVd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDCRDJEAVxvV4N66cRAu1VAJ4hkZQDmWWuvUuTdtDtfuVkAlZcFACg3k1a
OsPN2gTrK8ge5dn8Cal/nro=
=myTT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ylUvUtShPtQAJVVd--