Subject: Re: Incorrect vattr passed to VOP_SYMLINK?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/15/2005 18:22:48
On 8/15/05, Jason Thorpe <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2005, at 1:20 AM, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> > The thing is that I have a common function used by all VOPs that
> > create new nodes. This function bases its decision on the kind of
> > object that has to be created on the value of va_type, and was
> > working fine until I added symlinks, because the attribute had
> > the VNON value.
> Why not pass the type as a separate argument to that function, and
> then just always pass VLNK in the VOP_SYMLINK() case? That is what I
> have done in file systems on other operating systems.
Yes, of course I can do that. I just wanted to avoid it because it seemed
redundant if va_type also held the same value (which always does except
for this specific case).
Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/